pihole: Initial commit

This commit is contained in:
PorridgePi
2022-09-02 15:20:53 +01:00
parent 876189d37a
commit 3f792ad829
2 changed files with 110 additions and 0 deletions

42
pihole/docker-compose.yml Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
version: "3.9"
networks:
dns_net:
driver: bridge
ipam:
config:
- subnet: 172.20.0.0/16
services:
pihole:
image: pihole/pihole:latest
container_name: pihole
restart: unless-stopped
ports:
- "53:53/tcp"
- "53:53/udp"
- "8180:80/tcp"
hostname: pihole
networks:
dns_net:
ipv4_address: 172.20.0.10
environment:
- "TZ=Asia/Singapore"
- "WEBPASSWORD=${PIHOLE_PASSWORD}"
- "DNS1=172.20.0.11#5335"
- "DNS2=no"
volumes:
- "./etc-pihole/:/etc/pihole/"
- "./etc-dnsmasq.d/:/etc/dnsmasq.d/"
unbound:
image: mvance/unbound-rpi:latest
container_name: unbound
restart: unless-stopped
volumes:
- "./unbound:/opt/unbound/etc/unbound"
networks:
dns_net:
ipv4_address: 172.20.0.11
healthcheck:
disable: true

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
server:
# If no logfile is specified, syslog is used
# logfile: "/var/log/unbound/unbound.log"
verbosity: 0
interface: 172.20.0.11
port: 5335
do-ip4: yes
do-udp: yes
do-tcp: yes
access-control: 172.20.0.10 allow
# May be set to yes if you have IPv6 connectivity
do-ip6: no
# You want to leave this to no unless you have *native* IPv6. With 6to4 and
# Terredo tunnels your web browser should favor IPv4 for the same reasons
prefer-ip6: no
# Use this only when you downloaded the list of primary root servers!
# If you use the default dns-root-data package, unbound will find it automatically
root-hints: "/opt/unbound/etc/unbound/root.hints"
# Trust glue only if it is within the server's authority
harden-glue: yes
# Require DNSSEC data for trust-anchored zones, if such data is absent, the zone becomes BOGUS
harden-dnssec-stripped: yes
# Don't use Capitalization randomization as it known to cause DNSSEC issues sometimes
# see https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/unbound-stubby-or-dnscrypt-proxy/9378 for further details
use-caps-for-id: no
# Reduce EDNS reassembly buffer size.
# IP fragmentation is unreliable on the Internet today, and can cause
# transmission failures when large DNS messages are sent via UDP. Even
# when fragmentation does work, it may not be secure; it is theoretically
# possible to spoof parts of a fragmented DNS message, without easy
# detection at the receiving end. Recently, there was an excellent study
# >>> Defragmenting DNS - Determining the optimal maximum UDP response size for DNS <<<
# by Axel Koolhaas, and Tjeerd Slokker (https://indico.dns-oarc.net/event/36/contributions/776/)
# in collaboration with NLnet Labs explored DNS using real world data from the
# the RIPE Atlas probes and the researchers suggested different values for
# IPv4 and IPv6 and in different scenarios. They advise that servers should
# be configured to limit DNS messages sent over UDP to a size that will not
# trigger fragmentation on typical network links. DNS servers can switch
# from UDP to TCP when a DNS response is too big to fit in this limited
# buffer size. This value has also been suggested in DNS Flag Day 2020.
edns-buffer-size: 1232
# Perform prefetching of close to expired message cache entries
# This only applies to domains that have been frequently queried
prefetch: yes
# One thread should be sufficient, can be increased on beefy machines. In reality for most users running on small networks or on a single machine, it should be unnecessary to seek performance enhancement by increasing num-threads above 1.
num-threads: 1
# Ensure kernel buffer is large enough to not lose messages in traffic spikes
so-rcvbuf: 1m
# Ensure privacy of local IP ranges
private-address: 192.168.0.0/16
private-address: 169.254.0.0/16
private-address: 172.16.0.0/12
private-address: 10.0.0.0/8
private-address: fd00::/8
private-address: fe80::/10